Discussão:Creation
Comments on Creation <comments />
Alive said ...
Jamesm said ...
I see your point but "Creation is Creation" was not mentioned in the article. "Creation is The Creation" means something useful, it implies that there is a uniqueness about it. Every Creation is unique? I've read that there are many Creations and the first one that created itself is the Absolute Absolutum. How it created itself such a long time ago, using the finest energy from the Absolute Nothing is something I cannot understand and probably won't for a few billion years.
--Jamesm 22:25, 27 May 2012 (BST)
Alive said ...
I must admit that you are right, JamesM. I should revise my point: Batman is the Batman.
---- M -- 22:45, 27 May 2012 (BST)
Prakorimas said ...
Maybe I didn't notice or missed something but I don't get it - what's energy? I know that it's an oscillation of sorts but of what? Oscillate only particles and motion like such can't exist on it's own... So, Creation is just a smallest and most active particle of all?
Anyone's help clearing that out or pointing to right page or article would be greatly appreciated as I'm lost here!
--Prakorimas (talk), 17:57, 7 July 2013 (CEST)
Allah. said ...
Every particle oscillates by its own force. It only stops to oscillate whenever a greater force stops it.
Now you are lost no longer.
Prakorimas said ...
Thanks, Allah!
But that still does not explain what's an energy - is that a wave that exists on its own in a form of Creation or is it a motion of smaller then quantum particles?..
--Prakorimas (talk), 08:14, 13 July 2013 (CEST)
Saying that Creation is Creation is as fascinating as saying Batman is Batman.
---- M -- 17:30, 27 May 2012 (BST)